英语学习网

Study English at Home

首页 | 托福(TOEFL) | 雅思(IELTS) | GMAT | GRE | 签证/留学/移民 | 工作求职 | 英语资料 | 英语作文 | 英语考试 | 英语听力 | 英语口语
当前位置:首页 > 雅思(IELTS) > 正文
雅思范文:汽油价格和控制交通污染
文章来源: 文章作者: 发布时间:2006-05-23 字体: [ ]

本文版权为网王军美味英语所有,转贴须注明来源!

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and pollution. What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think more effective?
 
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every major city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut down waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is doubtfully the optimal solution.
 
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such measures. The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road is reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve traffic problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation. In the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of available transport facilities.
 
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a result, reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh air. We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipment. 
 
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner energy resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the ability to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is completely clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn such technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
 
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by increasing gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be more effective solutions. 


↑返回顶部 打印本页 关闭窗口↓
用户名: 新注册) 密码: 匿名评论 [所有评论]
评论内容:(不能超过250字,需审核后才会公布,请自觉遵守互联网相关政策法规。
§最新评论:
推荐文章
·雅思与托福比较 ,雅思与托福区
·环雅名师陈湃雅思口语通关技巧
·雅思阅读学习方法(英)
·雅思写作图表作文标准化结构样本
·雅思作文高分需要注意的四大要点
·非英语专业一个月7.5雅思经历:
·历经三次考试06年终获雅思7分
·35周岁老菜鸟40小时雅思6.5分记
热点文章
·《雅思词汇真经》录音mp3
·雅思阅读基本技巧谈
·留学该考TOEFL还是考IELTS
·雅思考试报名费今起上涨至
·雅思写作绝招--开头万能公
·关于雅思口语考试的忠告
·雅思与托福比较 ,雅思与
·雅思写作绝招--“七项基本
英语学习
·雅思与托福比较 ,雅思与
·奉献雅思复习科学的方法(
·雅思阅读T/F/NG模拟试题(4
·雅思阅读T/F/NG模拟试题(3
·雅思阅读T/F/NG模拟试题(2
·雅思阅读T/F/NG模拟试题(1
·《雅思阅读真经2》勘误与
·《雅思阅读真经2》勘误与
www.0641.com 英语学习网