|
5、小孩是学会竞争还是合作
For Competition:
1. Competition is inevitable; it’s human nature.
2. Competition builds character; it strengthens our self-esteem.
3. Competition is regarded as an open and fair race where success goes to the swiftest people regardless of their social status.
4. Competition is required to help us reach our fullest potential.
5. Natural selection and survival of the fittest.
For Cooperation:
1. Cooperation offers us a break from the pressure and stress of competition.
2. A win-win approach tends to fosters exploration of the root causes of the conflict and leads to constructive, sustainable solutions with positive expectation for future encounters.
3. Cooperative groups display more coordinated efforts, more division of labor, more acceptance of other ideas, and fewer communication difficulties than competitive groups.
4. Two heads are better than one.
5. Cooperation is marvelously successful at helping children to communicate effectively, to trust in others and to accept those who are different from themselves.
6、广泛使用机器人是好事还是坏事
For:
1. The employment of robots on assembly lines saves a lots of labor forces.
2. This trend not only improves the work efficiency, but also enhances accuracy.
3. Robots can take the place of human beings and work in the dangerous environment or the places not accessible for us.
4. Robots can work around the clock, never knowing tiredness.
Against:
1. As robots are designed by human beings, what they do is just to follow the instruction and preset programming by human being.
2. Once there is something wrong with the electric or programms, robot will become a good-to-nothing machine.
3. Robots cannot work creatively when confronted with complicated situations.
4. With the excessive dependence on robots, human beings will degenerate into a kind of animals that only to take food. 7、明星高薪是否合理？
For:
1. The stars are talented people.
2. Their brilliant performances enrich people’s cultural/spiritual life, which partly contributes to the spiritual civilization.
3. They bring great pleasure and happiness to ordinary people. They make money by means of their skills and they deserve it. No one forces you to pay for his/her performance. Both are willing.
4. Some of the stars also have undergone painstaking training and practice. No pains, no gains. The road to success may not be easy for most pop stars, which may set examples for the youngsters.
5. Different occupations or professions can command a different amount of money.
6. They sacrifice a lot for what they gain including privacy.
7. They bring benefits to the tertiary industry and prosper some professions like entertainment and related ventures.
8. It is an inevitable outcome of the market economy. We should not make a fuss of it. It is decided by the market.
Against:
1. We should value the talents who promote the welfare of the society as a whole rather than these pop stars.
2. We can live without pop stars, but cannot without a doctor or a teacher. Our society can proceed well without these stars.
3. The value of knowledge is depreciating.
4. Discourage /strike the initiative and zeal of people in other fields.
5. Impose an adverse influence on the development of the next generation, which may easily become money-oriented.
6. This phenomenon, to some extent, even contaminates the order of the day/general mood.
7. What they pay cannot equal their gain.
8. They make little contribution to the development of the society compared with the scientists.
9. With the quick-earned money the pop star’s vanity may quickly expand and their souls may be distorted.
Conclusion:
It is essential that effective measures should be taken to redress such inequality and disparity. The government should levy heavier income tax on these stars in order to narrow the gap between the income of so-called pop stars and that of the ordinary professions such as doctors and teachers.
|
