英语学习网

Study English at Home

首页 | 托福(TOEFL) | 雅思(IELTS) | GMAT | GRE | 签证/留学/移民 | 工作求职 | 英语资料 | 英语作文 | 英语考试 | 英语听力 | 英语口语
当前位置:首页 > 英语资料 > 正文
G类TASK2范文:是否应砍掉非专业课程
文章来源: 文章作者: 发布时间:2006-05-23 字体: [ ]

发贴:房挺

WRITING TASK 2

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task

With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (eg: physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

You should write at least 250 words.

What young people should study at school has long been the subject of intense debate and this is a question that certainly does not have one correct answer.

We need to provide young people the best possible chance of doing well at school. In traditional curriculum there is a wide variety of subjects with a mix of academic and non-academic subjects. In this way a young person is formed with a rounded education. Non-academic subjects would include sports, cooking, woodwork and metalwork. I believe this is the best form of education. A young person should learn things other than academic subjects. Sport is particularly important. Young people have to learn to love sport so that they can be fit and healthy later in life. If not we will be raising an obese and unfit generation.

I totally understand the point of view that education is so important that students must be pushed as hard as possible to achieve their best. It sounds a good idea to only expose the students to academic subjects as then they can spend all of their school hours on studying areas that will get them into university and good jobs later in life. I just feel a more rounded education would produce a better individual. We must remember too that a lot of people, maybe even most people, aren’t academically minded and would benefit more from a more vocationally based education. Forcing academic studies onto them would lead to failure and the student leaving school too early.

Therefore I agree that although a wholly academic curriculum would suit and benefit some young people, I believe that for most students non-academic subjects are important inclusions still in today’s syllabuses.


↑返回顶部 打印本页 关闭窗口↓
用户名: 新注册) 密码: 匿名评论 [所有评论]
评论内容:(不能超过250字,需审核后才会公布,请自觉遵守互联网相关政策法规。
§最新评论:
推荐文章
·两遍阅读法 顺利通过CET各级考试
·如何顺利通过CET各级考试
·各省市CET广播频率集合
·12月24日CET考试温馨提示
·考试技巧可以助你顺利过CET
·细节决定成败,CET应试技巧助你拿
·赴美申请提前半年ACT、SAT很关键
·解析美国高考SAT 拿满分不是不可
热点文章
·两遍阅读法 顺利通过CET各
·英语大师们谈英语学习成功
·俞敏洪从100套真题中提炼
·阅读技巧加油站
·新东方作文主题预测
·英语历年真题词汇手册(199
·三十五个经典句型 帮你过
·如何顺利通过CET各级考试
英语学习
·两遍阅读法 顺利通过CET各
·五点备战“复合式听写”
·细节决定成败,CET应试技巧
·写作错误与分析
·英语大师们谈英语学习成功
·教育部大学英语分数制与题
·俞敏洪从100套真题中提炼
·阅读技巧加油站
www.0641.com 英语学习网